JakeD
03-24-05, 10:26AM
A bill permitting the use of deadly force during a home invasion or when an individual considers themselves threatened unanimously passed the Florida Senate on Wednesday.
The measure (SB 436) would eliminate criminal penalties for an individual who uses deadly force as self-protection in his home or vehicle and other unspecified circumstances.
...
"You have to be within the confines of the dwelling as described in this bill," Peaden said during Wednesday's floor debate. "You just can't shoot anybody on the street and drag 'em in."
Geller said he voted for the bill for political reasons.
"We'd be seen as Democrats soft on crime," he said.
Sure, it says "within the confines of your own home", and I completely sympathize with the idea of deadly force during a home invasion, but the "threatened" part bothers me. Besides, how's the law going to dictate when someone feels threatened and when they don't? By that logic, a kid could kill their sibling during an argument, and everything would be just hunky-dory according to the State of Florida.
The measure (SB 436) would eliminate criminal penalties for an individual who uses deadly force as self-protection in his home or vehicle and other unspecified circumstances.
...
"You have to be within the confines of the dwelling as described in this bill," Peaden said during Wednesday's floor debate. "You just can't shoot anybody on the street and drag 'em in."
Geller said he voted for the bill for political reasons.
"We'd be seen as Democrats soft on crime," he said.
Sure, it says "within the confines of your own home", and I completely sympathize with the idea of deadly force during a home invasion, but the "threatened" part bothers me. Besides, how's the law going to dictate when someone feels threatened and when they don't? By that logic, a kid could kill their sibling during an argument, and everything would be just hunky-dory according to the State of Florida.