PDA

View Full Version : A suggestion for the quote function


Thaum1el
06-13-06, 08:41PM
I was thinking about a restructure of the quote function in the form for a new post.

The situation now
When you highlight a text and click the quote button, the action is automatically performed, and the text highlighted will be wrapped into a quote. Anything inside the quote tags will be included in the quote map, and anything outside the tags will be excluded. Alternatively you can use the [QUOTE] tag.

If you add a text after a = mark, it'll add a little line of text in the upper right-hand corner of the quote, stating "Originally Posted by <source>".

The suggestion
What I promose is that upon the click on the quote button, you get up a dialogue with a text line space, where you can state a source. If you fill in the source, it'll make the source addition. If you don't, this thing is not added. Furthermore, you can add a URL, and if it's a URL, recognized by the string beginning with "http://" it will instead add the text "Source" and be clickable.

Reason and difficulties
It might be a hard command to code, I don't know much about programming, and even less about programming NCT.

But it's a one time hack, and it'd make things much easier for those that likes to quote external sources, particularily those that quotes alot, since they don't have to manually put in the source themself into the text body, and the source declaration won't end up outside the quote wrap.

Bones
06-13-06, 11:23PM
You just confused me. Come on. It's a well known fact that I'm a Tard.

Thaum1el
06-14-06, 05:07AM
What I mean is that one should always be able to state a source for every quote in the posts.

I suggest that there should be able to add this source, either on clicking the quote button, or by manually writing it into the tag (the stuff between [] are tags), and that if the source starts with "http://" the word "source" becomes clickable.

Bones
06-14-06, 05:15AM
AHHHH OK. Get it now.

Thaum1el
11-14-07, 11:42AM
*bump*
Not a good idea?

Poseidon
11-14-07, 11:51AM
Idea is good. Programming is the question.

Diva
12-07-07, 12:29PM
I'm so sorry. I totally missed this thread! :(

I am trying to see exactly what you mean. Where are you quoting that you would need the URL? Do you mean when quoting something offsite?

Right now the source quote is the closest thing I have. I would have to hack into the board which I am not really good at. More importantly it would be something I would have to continue to hack each time I upgrade. As it is I dread any sort of upgrade because of the hacks I already have. If something goes wrong I am at the mercy of the hacking community, which isn't always very helpful. If I go to the main VB site the first thing they will say is to either remove all hacks or post on the hack site.

Thaum1el
12-30-07, 01:56AM
Yeah, that's what I was aiming at:

Instead of a having a person as source, one could have the option of using a website URL as source.

And, please, don't go nuts trying to get that thing together, it was just a little suggestion of something that could be done, when the powers that be have the time and inclination.

See it as: "This is a thing that could be added some day." more than "OMFG I want this!!!11!111oneone" :)

*hugs*